Compound and evidenceEarly oncology trial

RAD-140: research, sporting claims and risks

Investigational nonsteroidal SARM. Oncology safety research is not a trial of bodybuilding benefits. This overview separates named research from sporting claims.

Actual source photograph of RAD-140 packaging catalogued by Labgain
FIG. 01Actual source packaging. The photograph and label do not establish composition, testing or authorisation.
At a glance

The essential context.

  • Oncology safety research is not a trial of bodybuilding benefits.
  • The SARMs and related compounds category is a catalogue group, not a shared pharmacological class.
  • Source products and clinical or laboratory study material must not be assumed equivalent.
Actual source photograph of RAD-140 packaging catalogued by Labgain
FIG. 01Actual source packaging. The photograph and label do not establish composition, testing or authorisation.
01Research notes

What RAD-140 is

RAD-140, also called testolone, is an investigational nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulator. Receptor activity is the reason it appears in both laboratory research and performance-oriented marketing. The existence of a clinical development programme does not make a catalogue item an approved treatment, nor does it show that results in one disease setting apply to healthy users.

References[1]
Conceptual research map

RAD-140: target, model and open question

Conceptual overview without a dose, measurement curve or chemical structure.

01

Androgen receptor

Investigational nonsteroidal SARM

02

Studied model

Early oncology trial

03

Interpretation limit

Oncology safety research is not a trial of bodybuilding benefits.

Arrows connect research questions. They represent neither a treatment sequence nor a demonstrated sports benefit.
References[1]
02Research notes

What the named research shows

LoRusso and colleagues, Clinical Breast Cancer (2022; DOI 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.08.003), reported a phase I study in 22 women with metastatic breast cancer. Liver-test abnormalities were among the reported adverse events. The registered programme is NCT03088527.

Oncology safety research is not a trial of bodybuilding benefits.

References[1][2]
03Research notes

Why it is discussed in sport

Strength and muscle-gain claims are commonly attached to RAD-140 in sport discussions. An oncology phase I study asks about tolerability, pharmacokinetics and early disease-related signals in a particular patient population. It does not answer whether healthy lifters become stronger or whether any change is sustainable. Calling it human research without naming the population removes the context needed to understand the evidence.

References[1]
04Research notes

Risks and unresolved questions

The oncology population makes a direct estimate of harm in healthy athletes inappropriate, but it does not justify dismissing the liver findings. Early studies are not large enough to establish uncommon or long-term harms. FDA class warnings also include liver injury. Product substitution, combinations and uncertain identity create questions that the clinical paper did not test.

References[1][2]
05Research notes

Reading product claims alongside evidence

A research publication and a retail product answer different questions. The image shows the actual source packaging for recognition. It does not confirm contents, purity, sterility or suitability. A particular batch would require traceable sampling, identity testing and appropriate analytical documentation. A percentage printed on a label alone does not replace that documentation.

This overview separates observed results from extrapolation to athletes. It provides no use protocol. Potential benefits are described as studied signals or as claims in sporting discussions; missing long-term data are not treated as reassurance. New publications can change the assessment. The draft still requires editorial review before publication.

Further reading, clearer answers

Frequently asked questions

Is RAD-140 actually a SARM?

Investigational nonsteroidal SARM. Classification follows pharmacology rather than the name of a supplier category.

References[1]
Do the cited studies establish a safe sports benefit?

Oncology safety research is not a trial of bodybuilding benefits. Study populations, endpoints and observation periods limit the conclusion. A photograph or trade name does not resolve those gaps.

References[1]
↗Primary research & official records

Sources & further reading

Follow the original publications and records behind this overview. Each source answers a specific question; no single record establishes every aspect of a compound or product.

  1. 01 LoRusso et al., RAD140 phase I study, Clinical Breast Cancer 2022; DOI 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.08.003
  2. 02 NCI clinical trial record: RAD140, NCT03088527
  3. 03 FDA: SARMs consumer safety communication
Sources checked 2026-11-05
About the author

Dr. Monica Tatem earned her Ph.D. in Molecular Pharmacology from a leading medical university, followed by postdoctoral research focused on anabolic pathways and cellular signaling. Her scientific work encompasses a comprehensive...

View author profile
Explore the collection

From the research to the catalogue.

Review the individual product pages for labelled content, available documentation and current prices.

View all products ↗

Your selection

Known prices total€0.00

Local selection only. Availability, eligibility and final pricing are not confirmed.